From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flood v. National Football League

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 7, 2009
2:08-cv-0091-GEB-JFM-PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2009)

Opinion

2:08-cv-0091-GEB-JFM-PS.

January 7, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 21, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 21, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's November 5, 2008 motion to amend (docket no. 32) is denied; and

3. Defendants' October 23, 2008 motion to dismiss (docket no. 26) is granted and the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Flood v. National Football League

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 7, 2009
2:08-cv-0091-GEB-JFM-PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Flood v. National Football League

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RODERICK FLOOD, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 7, 2009

Citations

2:08-cv-0091-GEB-JFM-PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Mejia v. EMC Mortg. Corp.

Further, plaintiffs' reliance on alleged violations of a prior FTC order and Cal. Civ. Code § 2923.6 fails…

Jacobo v. Ross Stores, Inc.

To the extent it is the latter, Plaintiffs' claims fail because the FTCA does not create a private right of…