From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fliegman v. Hyundai Capital Am., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 27, 2021
21 CV 00565 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2021)

Opinion

21 CV 00565 (KMK)

10-27-2021

Mayer Fliegman, Plaintiff, v. Hyundai Capital America, Inc. d/b/a Kia Motors, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge:

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same sixty day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are denied. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Fliegman v. Hyundai Capital Am., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 27, 2021
21 CV 00565 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Fliegman v. Hyundai Capital Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Mayer Fliegman, Plaintiff, v. Hyundai Capital America, Inc. d/b/a Kia…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 27, 2021

Citations

21 CV 00565 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2021)