Summary
affirming conviction and sentence following the appellant’s admission to violating probation but remanding for the entry of a corrected order of revocation of probation to reflect those conditions the appellant admitted to violating
Summary of this case from Anderson v. StateOpinion
Case No. 5D19-134
12-27-2019
Richard V. FLETCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
COHEN, J.
In this Anders proceeding, Richard Fletcher appeals the judgment and sentence entered following his admission to violating his probation. We affirm but remand for entry of a corrected order accurately reflecting the conditions of probation Fletcher violated.
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Fletcher was on probation for two convictions of lewd or lascivious molestation. In the amended affidavit of violation of probation, the probation officer alleged that Fletcher committed two violations of condition 9 by failing to comply with his instructions, and one violation of condition 18 by failing to follow the rules of electronic monitoring. However, in his explanation of the violations, the probation officer alleged Fletcher violated condition 29, which is the actual condition related to Fletcher's electronic monitoring.
Condition 18 prohibited Fletcher from having contact with the victim of the underlying convictions unless certain circumstances were met.
Fletcher executed a plea form, admitting two violations of condition 9 and one violation of condition 29. During the course of the plea colloquy, the trial court inquired:
This is a [sic] admission of violation of multiple conditions on an amended affidavit of violation. It's a Condition 18, a Condition 9, a Condition 29, two other Condition 9s. And you are admitting to those conditions; you understand that?
Fletcher answered affirmatively.
The discrepancy between the executed plea form and the trial court's inquiry is understandable, considering the mistakes in the amended affidavit of violation of probation. Fletcher's plea form correctly identified that Fletcher admitted violating conditions 9 (twice) and 29, but the amended final order stated that Fletcher admitted to violating conditions 9, 18, and 29. Thus, we affirm Fletcher's conviction and sentence, but remand for entry of a corrected order. See Campbell v. State, 972 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (affirming order revoking probation but remanding for entry of order reflecting correct grounds for revocation).
In addition to the errors related to the alleged violations, the probation officer stated that Fletcher had a third, non-existent underlying conviction of lewd or lascivious molestation. Nonetheless, the amended final order correctly reflected that Fletcher had only two convictions of lewd or lascivious molestation.
--------
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.
LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.