From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fletcher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 23, 1997
693 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-3618

Opinion filed May 23, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Lon S. Cornelius, Senior Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Kathy Fletcher, Monticello, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


In this Anders appeal, we find on the face of the record that there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence. It appears to us that the discrepancy relating to the concurrent nature of the sentence is the result of a scrivener's error. However, in order to resolve any uncertainty, we remand for the trial court to resolve the discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written order.Aquino v. State, 661 So.2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Higginbotham v. State, 659 So.2d 461 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Marchand v. State, 546 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 554 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 1989). In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fletcher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 23, 1997
693 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Fletcher v. State

Case Details

Full title:KATHY FLETCHER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 23, 1997

Citations

693 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)