From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flemming v. Goord

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 29, 2008
06-cv-26 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2008)

Summary

dismissing Flemming's Eighth Amendment claims related to the deprivation of his walking cane

Summary of this case from Flemming v. Larose

Opinion

06-cv-26.

September 29, 2008


DECISION and ORDER


This matter brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report-Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c).

Objections to the September 9, 2008 Report-Recommendation have been filed. After examining the record de novo, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims in their entirety. Plaintiff's objections fail to cure or otherwise any of the deficiencies identified in the Report-Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Flemming v. Goord

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 29, 2008
06-cv-26 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2008)

dismissing Flemming's Eighth Amendment claims related to the deprivation of his walking cane

Summary of this case from Flemming v. Larose
Case details for

Flemming v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:WOODROW FLEMMING, Plaintiff, v. GLENN GOORD, Commissioner of NYS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 29, 2008

Citations

06-cv-26 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Doe

Instead, in opposition to the motion to dismiss, Rivera contends that he was not seeking damages in the…

Rivera v. Doe

Instead, in opposition to the motion to dismiss, Rivera contends that he was not seeking damages in the…