From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleming v. Aramark Foods

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Aug 29, 2008
No. 4:08CV1153 AGF (E.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. 4:08CV1153 AGF.

August 29, 2008


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the motion of Joseph Fleming (registration no. 42767), an inmate at the St. Louis City Justice Center, for leave to commence this action without payment of the required filing fee [Doc. #2]. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that plaintiff does not have sufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee and will assess an initial partial filing fee of $8.37. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Furthermore, based upon a review of the complaint, the Court finds that the complaint should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee. If the prisoner has insufficient funds in his or her prison account to pay the entire fee, the Court must assess and, when funds exist, collect an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of (1) the average monthly deposits in the prisoner's account, or (2) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the prior six-month period. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of the prisoner will forward these monthly payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee is fully paid. Id.

Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit and a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the submission of his complaint. A review of plaintiff's account indicates an average monthly deposit of $41.83, and an average monthly balance of $21.70. Plaintiff has insufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee. Accordingly, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $8.37, which is 20 percent of plaintiff's average monthly deposit.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court may dismiss a complaint filed in forma pauperis if the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. An action is frivolous if "it lacks an arguable basis in either law or in fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989). An action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted if it does not plead "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1974 (2007).

In reviewing a pro se complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must give the complaint the benefit of a liberal construction. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). The Court must also weigh all factual allegations in favor of the plaintiff, unless the facts alleged are clearly baseless. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974).

The Complaint

Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Named as defendants are Aramark Foods and Correctional Medical Services. The complaint seeks monetary relief.

Plaintiff alleges that on May 26, 2008, he was eating food supplied by defendant Aramark when he broke one of his teeth on a "rock." Plaintiff claims that he was in terrible pain as a result of the broken tooth. Plaintiff says that he requested medical help from CMS but that he was told to fill out a medical request form. Plaintiff maintains that he was slow to receive medical care and that CMS's treatment constitutes malpractice.

Discussion

To state a claim against Aramark or CMS, plaintiff must allege that a policy, custom, or official action of either defendant caused an actionable injury. Sanders v. Sears Roebuck Co., 984 F.2d 972, 975-76 (8th Cir. 1993). The complaint does not contain any allegations relating to a policy, custom, or official action of either defendant. As a result, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $8.37 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint because the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both.

An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order.


Summaries of

Fleming v. Aramark Foods

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Aug 29, 2008
No. 4:08CV1153 AGF (E.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Fleming v. Aramark Foods

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FLEMING, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK FOODS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 29, 2008

Citations

No. 4:08CV1153 AGF (E.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2008)