From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleischer v. Fleischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

July, 1916.


The undisputed and unexplained facts burden plaintiff's application with at least this infirmity: She is amply able financially to prosecute her suit and to support herself during its pendency. ( Collins v. Collins, 80 N.Y. 1; Lake v. Lake, 194 id. 179.) Order reversed and motion denied, without costs. Jenks, P.J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Fleischer v. Fleischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Fleischer v. Fleischer

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE EWART SCHWARZ FLEISCHER, Respondent, v. ERNST ALBERT FLEISCHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1916

Citations

174 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Citing Cases

Wolf v. Wolf

May, 1919. Order affirmed, without costs, on authority of Lake v. Lake ( 194 N.Y. 179); Fleischer v.…

Marshall v. Marshall

November, 1925. Order reversed on the law, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that defendant,…