From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleet v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 1
Dec 19, 1979
607 S.W.2d 257 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 62755.

December 19, 1979.

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Travis County, Mary Pearl Williams, J.

Ken E. Mackey, Austin, on appeal only, for appellant.

James L. McMurtry, County Atty., Sue F. Eley, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before ONION, P. J., and DOUGLAS and W. C. DAVIS, JJ.


OPINION


Fleet was convicted, before a justice of the peace, upon a plea of nolo contendere, of speeding. Upon appeal and trial de novo to the county court, he was again convicted, and the court fined him $200.00.

Fleet now contends that the court erred in overruling his motion to dismiss for failure to provide him with a speedy trial in the justice court pursuant to Article 32A.02, V.A.C.C.P.

A plea of nolo contendere is the equivalent to a plea of guilty. Sowell v. State, 503 S.W.2d 793 (Tex.Cr.App. 1974).

By pleading nolo contendere in the justice court, appellant waived his right under Article 32A.02, supra. Ramirez v. State, 590 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Fleet v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 1
Dec 19, 1979
607 S.W.2d 257 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979)
Case details for

Fleet v. State

Case Details

Full title:Timothy H. FLEET, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 1

Date published: Dec 19, 1979

Citations

607 S.W.2d 257 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Wightman-Cervantes v. State

Judge Nancarrow and the State maintain that this case is now moot because, inter alia, Wightman-Cervantes…

Valdez v. State

[w]e hold that such rights claimed by an accused under the [Speedy Trial Act] are not lost by a subsequent…