From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FLATLEY v. DORE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1925
212 App. Div. 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

January, 1925.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Burr, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.


The accident happened on September 2, 1918 near a street intersection in the city of Long Branch, in the State of New Jersey. Plaintiff is and was a resident of New Jersey. Defendants are and were residents of the State of New York.


Even if it could be fairly presumed from the evidence that Miss Dore had defendant Bennett's permission to use his car, which is denied, this would not be sufficient to make the latter liable. The accident occurred while the defendant Bennett's automobile was being driven by Miss Dore, admittedly, not on the business of Bennett, but for her own pleasure and enjoyment. The defendant is, therefore, not liable. ( Fallon v. Swackhamer, 226 N.Y. 444; Reilly v. Connable, 214 id. 586, 590.) The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

FLATLEY v. DORE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1925
212 App. Div. 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

FLATLEY v. DORE

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK FLATLEY, Respondent, v. GLADYS DORE, Defendant, Impleaded with…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1925

Citations

212 App. Div. 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)