From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flatiron 30 LLC v. The Continuum Co.

Supreme Court, New York County
Jul 5, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 32298 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2023)

Opinion

Index No. 653355/2021 Motion Seq. No. 001

07-05-2023

FLATIRON 30 LLC Plaintiff, v. THE CONTINUUM COMPANY LLC, Defendant


Unpublished Opinion

Motion Date 01/06/2022

PRESENT: HON. FRANK P. NERVO Justice

DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION

HON. FRANK P. NERVO, JUSTICE

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY.

This matter was recently administratively transferred to Part IV.

Plaintiff landlord moves for summary judgment on its claim for rent and additional rent, pursuant to the parties' commercial lease agreement. Plaintiff further seeks partial summary judgment on its claims for attorney's fees, following either a hearing or paper submissions as to the amount of same. Defendant opposes contending, inter alia, that the COVID-19 pandemic and concomitant non-essential business shutdown rendered performance under the lease impossible, that landlord "committed numerous wrongful acts that constitute commercial tenant harassment," and that defendant was constructively evicted.

The standard by which the Court evaluates the instant motion is well-established. On a motion for summary judgment, the burden rests with the moving party to make a prima facie showing they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law and demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact (Friends of Thayer Lake, LLC v. Brown, 27 N.Y.3d 1039 [2016]). Once met, the burden shifts to the opposing party to submit admissible evidence to create a question of fact requiring trial (Kershaw v. Hospital for Special Surgery, 114 A.D.3d 75 [1st Dept 2013]). "Where a defendant moves for summary judgment and establishes a prima facie entitlement to such relief as a matter of law, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact" (Kesselman v. Lever House Rest., 29 A.D.3d 302 [1st Dept 2006]). However, a "feigned issue of fact" will not defeat summary judgment (Red Zone LLC v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 27 N.Y.3d 1048 [2016]). A failure to make a prima facie showing requires the Court to deny the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of opposing papers (Alverez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324 [1986]; see also JMD Holding Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp., 4 N.Y.3d 373 [2005]).

Here, there is no dispute that the parties entered into a commercial lease agreement and that, beginning in March 2021, defendant failed to make rent and additional rent payments pursuant to that agreement. Consequently, plaintiff has met its prima facie burden evincing its entitlement to summary judgment on its claims of rent and additional rent.

Turning to defendant's affirmative defenses and opposition to this motion, same fail to raise a triable issue of fact or otherwise rebut, as a matter of law, plaintiff's entitlement to summary judgment. To the extent that defendant contends the COVID-19 pandemic rendered its performance under the lease impossible or otherwise represents a casualty necessitating a rent abatement, the Appellate Division, First Department has repeatedly rejected these arguments (see e.g. Gap, Inc., v. 170 Broadway Retail Owner, LLC, 195 A.D.3d 575 [1st Dept 2021]; Gap, Inc. v. 44-45 Broadway Leasing Co. LLC, 206 A.D.3d 503 [1st Dept 2022]; Bremen House, Inc. v. LoBosco, 214 A.D.3d 557 [1st Dept 2023]). Neither does the COVID-19 pandemic, or shutdowns related to same, frustrate the purpose of a commercial lease (id.; see also Valentino USA Inc. v. 693 Fifth Owner LLC, 203 A.D.3d 480 [1st Dept 2022]).

Defendant's remaining claims, related to constructive eviction, landlordharassment, and complaints of improper building maintenance are unsupported by any admissible evidence and therefore fail to raise a triable issue of fact. Likewise, it is undisputed that defendant did not surrender the premises and, therefore, defendant's claims of eviction, actual or constructive, must fail (International Dev. Inst. Inc. v. Westchester Plaza, LLC, 194 A.D.3d 411 [1st Dept 2011]). Consequently, plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment for rent and additional rent is granted.

Finally, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on attorney's fees is granted to the extent of finding plaintiff entitled to attorney's fees, in an amount to be determined following submissions, as below. It is beyond cavil that plaintiff is entitled to attorney's fees pursuant to the parties' lease agreement.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's summary motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED, DECLARED, and ADJUDGED, that plaintiff FLATIRON 30 LLC, PO Box 234481 Great Neck, NY 11023, shall have judgment as against defendant, THE CONTINUUM COMPANY LLC, 30 W 21st Street 11th Floor New York, NY 10010, in the amount of $846,605.77 together with costs and interest at the statutory rate, as calculated by the Clerk of the Court, from March 1, 2020; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's papers in support of the amount of attorney's fees shall be filed via NYSCEF, with courtesy copy to chambers via first-class mail, no later than August 25, 2023; and it is further

ORDERED that papers in opposition to the amount of attorney's fees sought by plaintiff shall be filed via NYSCEF, with courtesy copy to chambers via first-class mail, no later than September 29, 2023; and it is further

ORDERED that should defendant seek to cross-examine plaintiff's witness(es) as to attorney work performed in this matter, defendant shall so request in bold type face on the first page of its affirmation/brief in opposition and defendant shall further detail those entries on which it seeks to crossexamine plaintiff's witness(es); and it is further

ORDERED that absent a limited cross-examination hearing being scheduled by the Court, the inquiry into the amount of attorney's fees due plaintiff shall be returnable on papers on October 2, 2023; and it is further

ORDERED that the above deadlines shall not be adjourned absent Court order; and it is further

ORDERED that judgment shall be submitted to the Clerk Office, and not to chambers or the part, unless directed otherwise by that office.


Summaries of

Flatiron 30 LLC v. The Continuum Co.

Supreme Court, New York County
Jul 5, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 32298 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2023)
Case details for

Flatiron 30 LLC v. The Continuum Co.

Case Details

Full title:FLATIRON 30 LLC Plaintiff, v. THE CONTINUUM COMPANY LLC, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Jul 5, 2023

Citations

2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 32298 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2023)