From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flaming v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Mar 23, 2016
No. 07-16-00084-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 23, 2016)

Opinion

No. 07-16-00084-CV

03-23-2016

JARROD NEAL FLAMING, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A BAD DOG BAIL BONDS, APPELLANTS v. YOLANDA RODRIGUEZ, ET AL., APPELLEES


On Appeal from the 47th District Court Potter County, Texas
Trial Court No. 100329-A, Honorable Dan L. Schaap, Presiding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before the court is a request from Jarrod Neal Flaming "to remove the request for appeal at this time." He appealed pro se. We interpret the communication as a motion to dismiss his appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a). In so interpreting it, we grant the motion without passing on the merits and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at the party's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam


Summaries of

Flaming v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Mar 23, 2016
No. 07-16-00084-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Flaming v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:JARROD NEAL FLAMING, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A BAD DOG BAIL BONDS, APPELLANTS…

Court:Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

No. 07-16-00084-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 23, 2016)