Opinion
No. SC12–1440.
2013-10-8
We hereby dismiss the case for lack of standing, because the Appellant did not demonstrate that it is adversely affected by the Appellee's decision and does not cite to competent, substantial evidence in the record supporting this position. See Martin Cnty. Conservation Alliance v. Martin Cnty., 73 So.3d 856, 862–64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (explaining that to have standing to appeal an organization must demonstrate that it is adversely affected by the decision and acknowledging that mere speculation regarding future adverse impacts is insufficient). POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., concurs in result.