From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fla. Bar v. Goldfarb

Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov 20, 2014
157 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–2129.

11-20-2014

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. Steven Howard GOLDFARB, Respondent(s).


Opinion

The conditional guilty plea and consent judgment for discipline are approved and respondent is suspended from the practice of law for ninety-days, effective thirty days from the date of this order so that respondent can close out his practice and protect the interests of existing clients. If respondent notifies this Court in writing that he is no longer practicing and does not need the thirty days to protect existing clients, this Court will enter an order making the suspension effective immediately. Respondent shall fully comply with Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 3–5.1(h). In addition, respondent shall accept no new business from the date this order is filed until he is reinstated. Respondent is further directed to comply with all other terms and conditions of the consent judgment.

Respondent shall pay restitution in the amount of $4,350.00 to Dinora Barsky under the terms and conditions set forth in the consent judgment.

Judgment is entered for The Florida Bar, 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399–2300, for recovery of costs from Steven Howard Goldfarb in the amount of $1,250.00, for which sum let execution issue.

Not final until time expires to file motion for rehearing, and if filed, determined. The filing of a motion for rehearing shall not alter the effective date of this suspension.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fla. Bar v. Goldfarb

Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov 20, 2014
157 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Fla. Bar v. Goldfarb

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. Steven Howard GOLDFARB, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Nov 20, 2014

Citations

157 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 2014)