From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzpatrick v. Parkchester Dep't of Pub. Safety LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 22, 2020
Docket No.: 1:18-cv-00211 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2020)

Opinion

Docket No.: 1:18-cv-00211 (JGK)

06-22-2020

ERIC FITZPATRICK, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly-situated, Plaintiff, v. PARKCHESTER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LLC d/b/a PARKCHESTER DPS LLC, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT , SERVICE AWARD, AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES, AND THE ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT

This matter having come before the Court, on consent of all parties, for a fairness hearing on June 18, 2020, pursuant to the Court's Order granting Named Plaintiff Eric Fitzpatrick's Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement, Certification of Settlement Class, Appointment of Named Plaintiff as Class Representative, Appointment of Plaintiff's Counsel as Class Counsel, and Approval of Proposed Notice of Settlement and Class Action Settlement Procedure ("Preliminary Approval Motion") (Dkt. No. 47). Upon due and adequate notice having been given to the Class Members as defined below, as required by the Preliminary Approval Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein to determine the fairness of and final approval of the parties' settlement on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and Opt-in Plaintiffs (together as "FLSA Plaintiffs") and the Rule 23 New York class action Plaintiffs ("Rule 23 Plaintiffs," and together with the FLSA Plaintiffs as "Class Members") (hereinafter referred to as the "Settlement"), and otherwise being fully informed and for good cause shown, the Court finds that the Settlement reached by the parties is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the FLSA Plaintiffs and the Rule 23 Plaintiffs as defined in the Court's Preliminary Approval Order, and satisfies all requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ. P.") 23(a) and (b)(3), as well as Section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. This Order GRANTING the Consent Motion for Final Approval of Class and Collective Action Settlement, Service Award, an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses, and the Entry of Final Judgment, incorporates by reference the definitions in the Settlement Agreement and all exhibits, addendums, stipulations, and schedules thereto.

2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this litigation and all members of the Federal and New York classes.

3. After consideration of the evidence, the Court finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice of Class Action Settlement ("Notice") constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and that such Notice, including individual notice to Class Members whose mailing addresses and other contact information were identified through reasonable effort, constituted valid, due, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto, complying fully with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 and due process.

4. On behalf of the FLSA Plaintiffs and Rule 23 Plaintiffs, this Court hereby approves the Settlement, finds that it is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interest of Class Members, and with respect to the Rule 23 Plaintiffs satisfies the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and (b)(3) and City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 495 F.2d 448, 463 (2d Cir. 1974), and with respect to the FLSA Plaintiffs satisfies Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) and those factors identified in Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). The Court directs that the Settlement be consummated in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order and Orders all Parties to take the necessary steps to effectuate Settlement.

5. The Court has previously certified, and now grants in light of the date of entry of the Preliminary Approval Order, final certification to the following two Settlement Classes:

a. under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), all hourly non-exempt employees employed by Defendant at any time from October 27, 2014 to December 31, 2017, who were subject to the then-applicable collective bargaining agreement between Defendant and Special Patrolman Benevolent Association Local 1, and identified on the Class List produced by Defendant on February 6, 2020, and who negotiate their settlement checks to thereby opt-in to this action ("Federal Class"); and

b. under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and (b)(3), all hourly non-exempt employees employed by Defendant in New York at any time from October 27, 2014 to December 31, 2017, who were subject to the then-applicable collective bargaining agreement between Defendant and Special Patrolman Benevolent Association Local 1, and identified on the Class List produced by Defendant on February 6, 2020 ("New York Class").

6. The Court hereby makes the following findings of fact:

(a) Class Counsel has vigorously prosecuted this case and conducted extensive investigation of the governing law, relevant facts, and relevant documents. During the prosecution of the litigation, Class Counsel and Defendant's counsel undertook meaningful and sufficient investigation and the parties exchanged sufficient and adequate discovery to fully and fairly evaluate the claims and defenses asserted by the parties, and to make an informed decision about the Settlement.

(b) The distribution of the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and equitable.
(c) The Settlement provides for a Settlement Fund of $703,527.83, of which $428,660.56 is available to satisfy the claims of the Settlement Class Members. Out of 176 people mailed notices, zero Class Members opted out and zero Class Members timely objected. Class Members were not required to submit claim forms, meaning that all Class Members will be mailed a check for their individual settlement amounts, calculated based on the number of weeks that he or she worked between October 27, 2014 to December 31, 2017. Recovery for each Class Member will be based on the following formula:
$703,527.83 - [Fees, Costs, and Service Award] x Individual Class Member's Total Weeks Worked/Class Members' Combined Total Weeks Worked = Individual Settlement Amount
(d) The Settlement provides for a service award to the Named Plaintiff Eric Fitzpatrick in the amount of $20,000.00.

(e) The Settlement also provides for a payment of $234,509.28, or the equivalent of 33.33% of the total Settlement Fund as attorneys' fees, plus $4,276.99 for Class Counsel's out-of-pocket expenses, totaling $238,786.27, to be paid to Class Counsel.

(f) Class Administrator fees are to be paid to Rust Consulting, Inc. ("Rust") in the amount of $16,081.00.

(g) Given the disputed issues of fact and law and the risks to the Class Members, and the further delay that would be caused by continued litigation, including potential trial, and the subsequent appeal of any judgment after trial, the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the Class Members.
(h) Considering the factual and legal issues in dispute, anticipated motion practice, the possibility of trials and appeals, and the expected duration of litigation, the terms and amount offered in the Settlement are favorable.

(i) All counsel represented the interests of their clients vigorously and devoted a considerable amount of time, effort, and resources to secure the terms of the Settlement, including the plan of allocation and distribution to ensure a fair, adequate, and equitable distribution.

7. Based on those findings of fact, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

(a) The terms and provisions of the Settlement have been entered into in good faith and are hereby fully and finally approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class, and in full compliance with all applicable due process requirements. The Parties are hereby directed to comply with the terms of the Settlement and this Order and Final Judgment. Rust is hereby directed to distribute payments to the 176 Class Members in accordance with the terms of the Settlement.

(b) The Settlement is hereby approved as fair and reasonable. The allocation and distribution as set forth in the Settlement are final.

(c) Neither the Settlement, nor any of its provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission by any party of the truth of any allegations in this action, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind.
(d) The Named Plaintiff, FLSA Plaintiffs, and Rule 23 Plaintiffs, shall be bound by all of the terms, obligations, and conditions of the Settlement, including but not limited to the release of claims set forth therein, and all determinations and judgments in this action concerning the Settlement.

(e) All Class Members, including the Named Plaintiff and Opt-in Plaintiffs, hereby release Defendant from New York Labor Law wage and hour claims that were asserted or could have been asserted in this lawsuit.

(f) Class Members who cash their settlement checks will thereby release Defendant from FLSA wage and hour claims that were asserted or could have been asserted in this lawsuit.

(g) The Named Plaintiff, Eric Fitzpatrick, hereby additionally releases Defendant from any and all claims arising from his employment with Defendant in exchange for his service award;

(h) Having reviewed the appropriate case law, the request for Service Award is granted. Rust is hereby ordered to pay Named Plaintiff in the amount of $20,000.00, apportioned from the Settlement Funds as explained in the Notices.

(i) Having reviewed the appropriate case law and Class Counsel's billing records and having conducted a cross-check with Class Counsel's lodestar calculation, and with no objection from Defendant or any Class Member, the Court finds that Class Counsel's application for attorneys' fees in the amount of $234,509.28, apportioned from the Settlement Funds as explained in the Notices, is fair and reasonable and is granted. Having
reviewed Class Counsel's request for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses and accounting of all expenses, and with no objection by Defendant or any Class Member, Class Counsel's request for expenses in the amount of $4,276.99, apportioned from the Settlement Fluids as explained in the Notices, is granted.

(j) Rust is to be paid $16,081.00 for its administration fees and costs from the Settlement Amount, apportioned from the Settlement Fund as explained in the Notices.

(k) Should any Class Members fail to cash then checks within 120 days of distribution, Rust shall return the amount in uncashed checks to Defendant.

(l) All claims against Defendant in this action are dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close this case, but the Court shall retain exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the construction, interpretation, implementation, and enforcement over the Parties' Settlement and over the administration and distribution of the Settlement Fund.

(m) For the reasons stated on the record, all objections, timely or untimely, are overruled.

8. Final Judgment is hereby entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. SO ORDERED, this 22 day of June, 2020, New York, New York.

/s/ John G. Koeltl

The Honorable John G. Koeltl, U.S.D.J. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
New York, NY
June 22, 2020
/s/ John G. Koeltl
John G. Koeltl, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Fitzpatrick v. Parkchester Dep't of Pub. Safety LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 22, 2020
Docket No.: 1:18-cv-00211 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Fitzpatrick v. Parkchester Dep't of Pub. Safety LLC

Case Details

Full title:ERIC FITZPATRICK, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 22, 2020

Citations

Docket No.: 1:18-cv-00211 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2020)