From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1885
98 N.Y. 649 (N.Y. 1885)

Opinion

Argued February 11, 1885

Decided March 3, 1885

Julius Lipman for appellant.

H.H. Anderson for respondent.


Per curiam mem. for reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in nonsuiting plaintiff, that the case should have been submitted to the jury.

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., not voting.

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1885
98 N.Y. 649 (N.Y. 1885)
Case details for

Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FITZPATRICK, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v . THE NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 3, 1885

Citations

98 N.Y. 649 (N.Y. 1885)