From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitz v. Monsanto Co. (In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig.)

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 11, 2023
MDL 2741 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2023)

Opinion

MDL 2741 16-md-02741-VC

12-11-2023

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to: Fitz et al. v. Monsanto Co., Case No. 21-cv-03580-VC


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULING ORDER AND DEEM EXPERT REPORT TIMELY SERVED RE: DKT. NOS. 17423, 17472

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons stated at the December 7 hearing, Monsanto's motion for summary judgment is denied and the plaintiffs' motion is granted. The above-captioned case is moved to Wave 7D.

As discussed, the plaintiffs' counsel shall pay Monsanto's reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred in (1) filing and briefing the motion for summary judgment, (2) opposing the motion to modify the scheduling order, and (3) preparing for and appearing at the December 7 hearing. No portion of those expenses shall be paid by the plaintiffs themselves, nor shall the expenses be deducted from any recovery eventually received by the plaintiffs.

Within seven days of the entry of this order, Monsanto shall submit a bill to plaintiffs' counsel. Plaintiffs' counsel shall pay within seven days of receiving the bill, unless there is an objection to the amount, in which case that objection shall be filed within seven days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fitz v. Monsanto Co. (In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig.)

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 11, 2023
MDL 2741 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Fitz v. Monsanto Co. (In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 11, 2023

Citations

MDL 2741 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2023)