From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fites v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 30, 2006
No. 3-06-CV-0559-M (N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2006)

Opinion

No. 3-06-CV-0559-M.

March 30, 2006


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Petitioner Wallace Fites, appearing pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this habeas case brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons stated herein, the application should be denied.

I.

Petitioner is currently serving an 18-year sentence for burglary of a building. Although the precise nature of his claim is difficult to decipher, it appears that petitioner is challenging the calculation of his sentence by the TDCJ and the validity of his underlying conviction. Process has been withheld pending a determination of the application to proceed in forma pauperis.

II.

The standards governing in forma pauperis motions are set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The district court may authorize the commencement of a civil action without the prepayment of fees or costs "by a person who submits an affidavit . . . that [he] is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The court must examine the financial condition of the applicant in order to determine whether the payment of fees would cause an undue financial hardship. Prows v. Kastner, 842 F.2d 138, 140 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 364 (1988). The amount of money available to an inmate in his prison trust account or from other sources should be considered. See id.; Braden v. Estelle, 428 F.Supp. 595, 601 (S.D. Tex. 1977).

Petitioner has submitted an affidavit in support of his application to proceed in forma pauperis. A statement of his inmate trust account is attached. The record shows that petitioner has $55.78 on deposit with prison officials. The filing fee for a habeas petition is $5.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The court concludes that petitioner is able to pay this fee without causing undue financial hardship. See also MISC. ORDER 13 at ¶ 9 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 1977) (requiring habeas petitioner to pay filing fee if prison account and other resources exceed $50.00).

RECOMMENDATION

The application to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied. Petitioner should be ordered to pay the statutory filing fee by April 28, 2006. If he fails to do so, this case should be dismissed without further notice.

A copy of this report and recommendation shall be served on all parties in the manner provided by law. Any party may file written objections to the recommendation within 10 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The failure to file written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996).


Summaries of

Fites v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 30, 2006
No. 3-06-CV-0559-M (N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Fites v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:WALLACE FITES, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director Texas Department of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 30, 2006

Citations

No. 3-06-CV-0559-M (N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2006)