From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FITCH v. NUTE

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1883
62 N.H. 700 (N.H. 1883)

Opinion

Decided June, 1883.

Gould Martin, for the plaintiff.

Leach Stevens, for the defendants.


ASSUMPSIT. The objection to the maintenance of the action was, that it was brought in the name of the wrong party. Without deciding the question raised, it was held that the writ might, if necessary, be amended at the trial term, and without terms.

Case discharged.

ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

FITCH v. NUTE

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1883
62 N.H. 700 (N.H. 1883)
Case details for

FITCH v. NUTE

Case Details

Full title:FITCH v. NUTE a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack

Date published: Jun 1, 1883

Citations

62 N.H. 700 (N.H. 1883)

Citing Cases

State v. Collins

The statute required the petition to be signed by not less than twenty legal voters of Concord. P. S., c.…

Remick v. Company

The power of the court to allow the amendment is indisputable. P.S., c. 222, ss. 7, 8, 11; Stebbins v.…