From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fishman v. Trans Union Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 23, 2011
No. CV 11-2105-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 11-2105-PHX-JAT

11-23-2011

Stanley Fishman, Plaintiff, v. Trans Union Inc., Defendant.


ORDER

"Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge's first duty in every case." Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th Cir. 2003). In this case, the Notice of Removal pleads jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332, which is diversity. However, the Notice of Removal fails to adequately allege the citizenship of the parties such that this Court can independently assess its jurisdiction.

Specifically, limited liability companies take on the citizenship of their members. Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006). The Notice of Removal notes that Defendant is a limited liability company which Plaintiff incorrectly called a corporation. Because the Notice of Removal fails to plead the citizenship of the membership of the Defendant limited liability company, it fails to allege jurisdiction. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant must file an amended Notice of Removal by December 19, 2011, properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be remanded to state court.

James A. Teilborg

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fishman v. Trans Union Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 23, 2011
No. CV 11-2105-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Fishman v. Trans Union Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Stanley Fishman, Plaintiff, v. Trans Union Inc., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

No. CV 11-2105-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. Nov. 23, 2011)