From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 5, 2019
CV 74-90 TUC DCB (Lead Case) (D. Ariz. Nov. 5, 2019)

Opinion

CV 74-90 TUC DCB (Lead Case) CV 74-204 TUC DCB (Consolidated Case)

11-05-2019

Roy and Josie Fisher, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Anita Lohr, et al., Defendants, and Sidney L. Sutton, et al., Defendants-Intervenors, Maria Mendoza, et al., Plaintiffs, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Tucson Unified School District No. One, et al., Defendants.


SPECIAL MASTER'S CORRECTED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE INTERNET ACCESS

The concerns expressed about Internet access by the Mendoza plaintiffs deal with what was not done in the past. The District has made significant upgrades in Internet access in all schools and the access is than adequate in all District schools. The Fisher plaintiffs assert that students do not have access to the Internet because the District has failed to install software that would block access to pornography. This assertion is no longer true. The necessary software is in place.

The current status of Internet access should be the focus of the common of the concerned by this court.

The Mendoza plaintiffs want the District to add Internet access scores to the Facilities Condition Index. The District indicates that this is unnecessary because all schools would receive a passing score. But that is not a reason not to include the scores in any assessment of access and use of technology. It is not possible to anticipate what the need for Internet access will be in the future. Indeed, the District points to an example of a substantial recent change in the use of the Internet TUSD. What is adequate today may not be adequate in the future, e.g., technologists vary in their prediction of the consequences of moving from 4G to 5G capabilities in Internet transmission but all believe that it will be quite significant.

Recommendation

The District should add a measure of Internet access for each school to the TCI and assess the status of access at each school in the next regular testing of capability.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/_________

Willis D. Hawley

Special Master Dated: November 5, 2019

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 5, 2019, I electronically submitted the foregoing via the CM/ECF Electronic Notification System and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing provided to all parties that have filed a notice of appearance in the District Court Case.

/s/_________

Andrew H. Marks for

Dr. Willis D. Hawley,

Special Master


Summaries of

Fisher v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 5, 2019
CV 74-90 TUC DCB (Lead Case) (D. Ariz. Nov. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Fisher v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Roy and Josie Fisher, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States of America…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Nov 5, 2019

Citations

CV 74-90 TUC DCB (Lead Case) (D. Ariz. Nov. 5, 2019)