From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 24, 1998
709 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-00071

Opinion filed April 24, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Cecelia M. Moore, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen D. Ake, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Tony Fisher appeals from his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine. We find merit only in his argument that the trial court erred in failing to pronounce conditions of probation eight and twenty, which require him to pay for drug testing, because they are special conditions. See Smith v. State, 702 So.2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (holding that the requirement that a defendant pay for drug testing is a special condition of probation which must be pronounced at sentencing). The issue of whether these conditions are actually "special conditions" is presently pending in the supreme court. See Williams v. State, 700 So.2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), review granted, No. 91,655 (Fla. Feb. 5, 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm Fisher's judgment and sentence and strike conditions eight and twenty from his order of probation.

Affirmed as modified.

ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 24, 1998
709 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Fisher v. State

Case Details

Full title:TONY ANTHONY FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 24, 1998

Citations

709 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)