From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Dicus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 6, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02816-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 6, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-02816-JAD-VCF

11-06-2017

TIMOTHY FISHER, Plaintiff, v. A. DICUS et. al, Defendants.


Order

I. CHANGE OF ADDRESS

According to the Nevada Department of Corrections ("NDOC") inmate database, Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated. Plaintiff has not filed an updated address notification with the Court. The Court notes that pursuant to Nevada Local Rule of Practice IA 3-1, a "pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court." Nev. Loc. R. IA 3-1. This Court grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file his updated address with this Court. If Plaintiff does not update the Court with his current address within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. II. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

The Court denies the application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners (ECF No. 4) as moot because Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated. The Court now directs Plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner within thirty (30) days from the date of this order or pay the full filing fee of $400.

III. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that Plaintiff shall file his updated address with the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff fails to timely update his address, the Court shall dismiss this case without prejudice.

It is further ordered that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners (ECF No. 4) is denied as moot.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

It is further ordered that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis for nonprisoners; or (2) pay the full filing fee of $400. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /

It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff fails to timely file an application to proceed in forma pauperis for non-prisoners or pay the full filing fee of $400, the Court shall dismiss this case without prejudice. DATED THIS 6th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

Cam Ferenbach

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Fisher v. Dicus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 6, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02816-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Fisher v. Dicus

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY FISHER, Plaintiff, v. A. DICUS et. al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 6, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-02816-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 6, 2017)