From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 20, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-01383-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-01383-JAD-NJK

12-20-2013

EDWARD W. FISHER, JR. Plaintiff, v. REX BELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #1) and a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court finds that plaintiff is unable to pre-pay the filing fee. The court has reviewed the complaint and finds that this action must be dismissed.

Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), federal courts must dismiss the claim of a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis, if the action "is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). A complaint is frivolous "where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact . . . . [The] term 'frivolous,' when applied to a complaint, embraces not only the inarguable legal conclusion, but also the fanciful factual allegation." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); see also Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir. 1995). "[A] finding of factual frivolousness is appropriate when the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible, whether or not there are judicially noticeable facts available to contradict them. An in forma pauperis complaint may not be dismissed, however, simply because the court finds the plaintiff's allegations unlikely." Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). Allegations of a pro se complainant are held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).

Plaintiff alleges that defendants have implanted a secret listening device into his inner ear to steal military secrets and to violate his right to free expression of his religion. Plaintiff's allegations are wholly within the realm of fantasy, and the court is unable to give him any relief.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall not be required to pre-pay the full filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED as frivolous. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

________________

JENNIFER A. DORSEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fisher v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 20, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-01383-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Fisher v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD W. FISHER, JR. Plaintiff, v. REX BELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-01383-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2013)