From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fishback v. Antonovich

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 23, 2022
2:15-cv-05719-SB-RAO (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2:15-cv-05719-SB-RAO

08-23-2022

WAYNE FISHBACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge

Plaintiff filed this action in July 2015 alleging that Defendants conspired to dispossess him of his land. Dkt. No. 1. On August 5, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), dismissing all claims against all Defendants except his defamation claim against David Campbell. Dkt. No. 102.

Because the sole remaining claim is a state law defamation claim, the parties are hereby ORDERED to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the defamation claim and dismiss the remaining case without prejudice. The parties shall file written responses to this OSC by no later than August 26, 2022.


Summaries of

Fishback v. Antonovich

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 23, 2022
2:15-cv-05719-SB-RAO (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Fishback v. Antonovich

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE FISHBACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 23, 2022

Citations

2:15-cv-05719-SB-RAO (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2022)