From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischer v. Tushnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1939
256 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

January 23, 1939.


Appeal by defendant from so much of an order entered on his motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiff's unreasonable neglect to proceed in the action as granted plaintiff permission to serve and file a note of issue for the December, 1938, term of the court. Order modified by striking out everything after the word "granted" in the first decretal paragraph and by striking out the second decretal paragraph, and as thus modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Plaintiff failed to explain or excuse the delay of more than twenty-two months in bringing the cause on for trial, and also failed to make an adequate, or any, showing of merits. It was an improper exercise of discretion to deny the motion, in effect, by granting it conditionally. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fischer v. Tushnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1939
256 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Fischer v. Tushnett

Case Details

Full title:RITA FISCHER, Respondent, v. SAMUEL M. TUSHNETT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1939

Citations

256 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Tomczak v. Roetzer

( Gritz v. Gavigan, 69 N.Y.S.2d 18; Gabrielsen v. Brookhattan Trucking Co., 250 App. Div. 861.) The…

Munroe v. Vaskowitz

Both of these elements are essential in order for the plaintiffs to prevail in their opposition to this…