Opinion
June, 1901.
H.V. Rutherford, for appellants.
J. Wilkenfeld, for respondent.
The nonpayment of the bonus, was by the contract of employment, made dependent upon an exercise by the defendants of their reserved right to discharge the plaintiff within the year. He was not discharged, but served the full term, without any expression of dissatisfaction. He was, therefore, entitled to the extra compensation.
Present: SCOTT, P.J., BEACH and FITZGERALD, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.