Opinion
Submitted April 25, 1910
Decided May 3, 1910
Joseph A. Seidman for motion.
John D. Connolly opposed.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Fischel v. Lese
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1910
92 N.E. 1081 (N.Y. 1910)
Summaries of
Fischel v. Lese
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1910
92 N.E. 1081 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for
Fischel v. Lese
Case Details
Full title:HARRY FISCHEL, Respondent, v . LOUIS LESE, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 3, 1910
Citations
92 N.E. 1081 (N.Y. 1910)
198 N.Y. 597