holding that ERISA preemption applied to a case where an employer forged an insurance cancellation form because the cause of action involved the principal ERISA entities and because the plaintiff's claims “related to” the ERISA plan
Summary of this case from Nixon v. VaughnNo. 93-02939.
November 23, 1994.
S.D.Tex., 833 F.Supp. 607.
AFFIRMED
holding that ERISA preemption applied to a case where an employer forged an insurance cancellation form because the cause of action involved the principal ERISA entities and because the plaintiff's claims “related to” the ERISA plan
Summary of this case from Nixon v. VaughnIn Williams v. Shalala, 41 F.3d 664 (5th Cir. 1994), the Fifth Circuit considered the preclusive effect of a claimant's prior, unappealed denial of supplemental security income ("SSI") benefits.
Summary of this case from Dubroc v. Colvinnoting that the court's holding in Perkins “was based on our finding that the fraud did not affect the relations among the principal ERISA entities”
Summary of this case from Kersh v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co.Full title:First South Savings v. Burnap
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Nov 23, 1994
The term 'same material facts' means, in effect, that no new and material evidence has been submitted since…
Wilhite v. AstrueThis court finds Judge King was not obligated to obtain the additional MHMR records alluded to by Ms. Wilhite…