From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First National Bk. of High Bridge, New Jersey v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 11, 1917
222 N.Y. 556 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued November 26, 1917

Decided December 11, 1917

Harold Nathan, David Leventritt and Alfred A. Cook for appellant.

John Godfrey Saxe and John A. Garver for respondents.


The judgment of the Appellate Division must be affirmed, except as to one item.

There is evidence upon which it would be possible for a jury to find that the plaintiff's cashier, Beavers, purchased through the defendants one hundred shares of the stock of the Pressed Steel Car Company. The certificates were in the name of Goodhart Company, and were indorsed in blank.

On May 5th, 1911, one Rufe discounted a collateral note with the plaintiff for $4,500. The proceeds were placed to Beaver's credit. The collateral were changed from time to time. The certificates in question were delivered to Beavers on September 4th, 1912. He erased from the note the description of the collaterals then held as security for its payment, wrote in their place "100 Pressed St. Car" and placed the certificates in the plaintiff's pouch with the Rufe note as collateral thereto.

It would be possible for the jury further to find that on October 24th Beavers, without the consent of the plaintiff, took from the pouch these same certificates and returned them to the defendants.

Later, on March 17th, 1913, the defendants sold them and received $2,573 therefor.

If the jury should find these facts the plaintiff would be entitled to judgment against the defendants for that amount and interest.

The judgment appealed from should be, therefore, modified so as to read and provide: "Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, except as to the item of $2,573 value of the Pressed Steel Car Company stock and as to which item a new trial is granted," and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur; McLAUGHLIN, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

First National Bk. of High Bridge, New Jersey v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 11, 1917
222 N.Y. 556 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

First National Bk. of High Bridge, New Jersey v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HIGH BRIDGE, NEW JERSEY, Appellant, v . CHARLES I…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 11, 1917

Citations

222 N.Y. 556 (N.Y. 1917)
118 N.E. 506

Citing Cases

State Bank of Binghamton v. Bache

The facts known were certainly "suspicious circumstances of a substantial character." The defendants rely…

Employers' L.A. Corp. Ltd. v. Hudson River Tr. Co.

(Citing Havana Central R.R. Co. v. Knickerbocker Trust Co., supra; First National Bank v. Hudson, 166 App.…