From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First National Bank v. South San Joaquin Irrigation

Supreme Court of California
Oct 11, 1937
9 Cal.2d 781 (Cal. 1937)

Opinion

Docket No. S.F. 15798.

October 11, 1937.

MOTION to postpone consideration of an application for a writ of mandate to compel payment of irrigation district bonds. Motion granted.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Gillett Gillett, J.N. Gillett, Jr., Hugh D. Newhouse, Russell P. Tyler, tum Suden tum Suden, Pillsbury, Madison Sutro and W. Coburn Cook for Petitioners.

W. Coburn Cook and Charles L. Childers for Interveners.

Netter Rutherford, Newton Rutherford, Philip Cavalero and Stephen Dietrich for Respondents.

A.L. Cowell, Hankins Hankins, Arvin B. Shaw, Jr., Harry W. Horton, James R. McBride, C. Ray Robinson, Hugh K. Landrau, Stephen W. Downey and Downey, Brand Seymour for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The mandamus proceeding herein is the same, in all essential particulars, as that involved in the cause of Morris v. South San Joaquin Irr. Dist., S.F. No. 15198 ( ante, p. 701 [ 72 P.2d 154]), in which an order in abatement has been made this day. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that matter further proceedings herein should be suspended until the petition of the respondent district in the superior court has been heard and determined.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

First National Bank v. South San Joaquin Irrigation

Supreme Court of California
Oct 11, 1937
9 Cal.2d 781 (Cal. 1937)
Case details for

First National Bank v. South San Joaquin Irrigation

Case Details

Full title:FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN TURLOCK (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners, v…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 11, 1937

Citations

9 Cal.2d 781 (Cal. 1937)
72 P.2d 156