From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Firm v. Stangler

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
May 6, 2015
866 N.W.2d 406 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2014AP2495.

2015-05-06

KAY & KAY LAW FIRM, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert C. STANGLER, Defendant–Appellant.

Sec. 421.301(9). Stangler does not cite any authority to support his argument that a bill issued by an attorney constitutes a consumer credit sale. Also, we have been unable to find any case where an attorney's bill came under the Wisconsin Consumer Act. The contract obviously contemplates when and how Stangler was required to make payments. Stangler was bound by the contract to make payments in full as soon as he received a bill. Therefore, an installment plan was not contemplated under the clear, unambiguous terms of the contract.



Summaries of

Firm v. Stangler

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
May 6, 2015
866 N.W.2d 406 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Firm v. Stangler

Case Details

Full title:KAY & KAY LAW FIRM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT C. STANGLER…

Court:STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

866 N.W.2d 406 (Wis. Ct. App. 2015)
364 Wis. 2d 408
2015 WI App. 52