From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Firkus v. Telfer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
May 8, 2014
848 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2013AP1551.

2014-05-8

John FIRKUS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Gene Dixon TELFER and Helenville Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants–Appellants, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Inc. and Michael Foods, Inc. p/k/a Usable Life, Defendants.

Lueck, 57 Wis.2d at 262, 204 N.W.2d 6 (citing Thorp v. Landsaw, 254 Wis. 1, 8, 35 N.W.2d 307 (1948), which in turn cites Behling v. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co., 158 Wis. 584, 589, 149 N.W. 484 (1914)); see also Fondell v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 85 Wis.2d 220, 229–30, 270 N.W.2d 205 (1978). That standard of review still applies: Best Price Plumbing, Inc. v. Erie Ins. Exch., 2012 WI 44, ¶ 44, 340 Wis.2d 307, 814 N.W.2d 419 (citations omitted). “[W]e evaluate the evidence in the context of the instructions that were given to the jury.” Id., ¶ 42.



Summaries of

Firkus v. Telfer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
May 8, 2014
848 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Firkus v. Telfer

Case Details

Full title:John FIRKUS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Gene Dixon TELFER and Helenville…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

848 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
354 Wis. 2d 623
2014 WI App. 71

Citing Cases

Heintz v. Hanson

Subsequent deterioration in the deck's condition does not alter the fact that the undisputed evidence shows…