Fiorini v. U.S.

Full title: George J. Fiorini, II, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 30, 2006

Case No. 1:04cv295 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:04cv295.

January 30, 2006

ORDER

MICHAEL WATSON, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed January 5, 2006 (Doc. 36).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. This action is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.