Opinion
December 13, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The proper remedy for the alleged inequities of a pendente lite award is generally a speedy trial at which a more detailed examination of the parties' financial circumstances may be conducted (see, Aquart v Aquart, 182 A.D.2d 735; Caviolo v Caviolo, 155 A.D.2d 410; Sherman v Sherman, 135 A.D.2d 806). This is particularly true in this case where the affidavits present sharply conflicting views of the husband's financial situation and a speedy trial would permit prompt examination of the facts in far greater detail and allow a more accurate appraisal of his situation than can be made on a motion for temporary relief (see, Stone v Stone, 152 A.D.2d 560). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.