From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finster v. Lawrence

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Jul 30, 2020
No. 02-20-00025-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2020)

Opinion

No. 02-20-00025-CV

07-30-2020

GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER, Appellant v. KRISTINE LAWRENCE AND JACQUELINE FINSTER, Appellees


On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2019-009351-1 Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On July 6, 2020, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam Delivered: July 30, 2020


Summaries of

Finster v. Lawrence

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Jul 30, 2020
No. 02-20-00025-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Finster v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER, Appellant v. KRISTINE LAWRENCE AND JACQUELINE…

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 30, 2020

Citations

No. 02-20-00025-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2020)