From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finnegan v. Wework Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 27, 2021
21-CV-5593 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-5593 (LTS)

08-27-2021

SEAN MATTHEW FINNEGAN, Plaintiff, v. WEWORK, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated July 26, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court declines, under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of any state law claims that Plaintiff is asserting.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Finnegan v. Wework Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 27, 2021
21-CV-5593 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Finnegan v. Wework Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SEAN MATTHEW FINNEGAN, Plaintiff, v. WEWORK, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

21-CV-5593 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2021)