From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FINNEGAN v. FAZO

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford-New Britain at New Britain
Oct 31, 1990
1990 Ct. Sup. 2504 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1990)

Opinion

No. CV 90-0439283S

October 31, 1990.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AND SECOND SETOFFS


The plaintiff alleges that she was injured in an automobile accident on September 10, 1989, (A Tort Reform II case). The defendant in his answer has filed two setoffs. First, he claims pursuant to General Statutes section 52-225a a reduction in the amount of any jury award representing economic damages by any collateral source payments. Second, he claims the sum of $20,000.00 representing the payment received by the plaintiff from Dennis Finnegan by way of settlement. The plaintiff moves to strike the first and second setoffs.

The motion to strike the first setoff is granted. See Zagaja v. Guerrera, J.D. of Hartford/New Britain at Hartford, CV 89-0359674S (March 23, 1990) (Maloney, J.); Vining v. Capone, J.D. of Ansonia/Milford at Milford, CV 89-029926S (April 12, 1990) (Meadow, J.).

The motion to strike the second setoff is granted. "`Collateral Sources' do not include amounts received by claimant as a settlement." General Statutes section 52-225b.

FRANCES ALLEN SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

FINNEGAN v. FAZO

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford-New Britain at New Britain
Oct 31, 1990
1990 Ct. Sup. 2504 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1990)
Case details for

FINNEGAN v. FAZO

Case Details

Full title:LOIS FINNEGAN v. ARIF S. FAZO

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford-New Britain at New Britain

Date published: Oct 31, 1990

Citations

1990 Ct. Sup. 2504 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1990)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Motta

Second, it has been held that payments from a collateral source are not a proper legal setoff which must be…

Kelly v. Reynolds

Thus, a reduction of damages due to collateral source payments is not properly asserted as a special defense…