From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finley v. De La Trinidad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2012
Case No. 11cv2318 JLS (PCL) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11cv2318 JLS (PCL)

04-03-2012

Jowell Finley, Plaintiff, v. A. De La Trinidad et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Doc. 17);


ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (Doc. 20); AND


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR COPY OF LOCAL RULES (Doc. 21).


MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff Jowell Finley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). (Doc. 17.)

Section 1915(e)(1) provides that "[t]he court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel." However, the court may appoint counsel under Section 1915(e) only under "exceptional circumstances." Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986) (citation omitted). "A finding of exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Neither of these factors is dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision on request of counsel under section 1915[e]." Id. (citations and internal quotations omitted).

Here, Plaintiff argues that he is entitled to appointed counsel because he is indigent and he has only a high school education without a proficient grasp of the laws involved in his case. (Doc. 17, at 1-3.) However, these reasons do not amount to exceptional circumstances entitling Plaintiff to a court-appointed attorney. Thus, Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice.

MOTION FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Plaintiff filed a motion for pretrial conference. (Doc. 20.) However, the motion is DENIED as moot. The Court has already set a Case Management Conference set for April 24, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.

MOTION FOR COPY OF LOCAL RULES

Plaintiff filed a motion for a copy of the local rules. (Doc. 21.) The Court hereby GRANTS the motion. The Clerk of the Court is ordered to send Plaintiff a copy of the local rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

U.S. Magistrate Judge

United States District Court
cc: The Honorable Sammartino

All Parties and Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Finley v. De La Trinidad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2012
Case No. 11cv2318 JLS (PCL) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Finley v. De La Trinidad

Case Details

Full title:Jowell Finley, Plaintiff, v. A. De La Trinidad et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11cv2318 JLS (PCL) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Salas v. Candelario

However, courts in this district have granted incarcerated plaintiffs' requests for copies of the local rules…