From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finlaw v. Wertheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1936
4 N.E.2d 731 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued September 30, 1936

Decided October 20, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Lionel S. Popkin for appellants.

S. Harry Eilenberg and Harold F. Levin for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. Johnston v. Trask ( 116 N.Y. 136) has not been overruled or modified by DeWaal v. Jamison ( 226 N.Y. 644). (See, also, Hyman-Michaels Co. v. Senior Palmer, Inc., 265 N.Y. 266.) No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Finlaw v. Wertheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1936
4 N.E.2d 731 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Finlaw v. Wertheim

Case Details

Full title:FRANK L. FINLAW, Respondent, v. MAURICE WERTHEIM et al., Co-partners under…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 20, 1936

Citations

4 N.E.2d 731 (N.Y. 1936)
4 N.E.2d 731

Citing Cases

Cooper v. Brook

This is not a case of the defendants selling their own property and agreeing to repurchase, a species of…

Cooper v. Brook

This is not a case of the defendants selling their own property and agreeing to repurchase, a species of…