From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 25, 1934
152 Misc. 439 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

July 25, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Tanner, Sillcocks Friend [ Frederick C. Tanner and Leonard M. Gardner of counsel], for the appellant.

Wikler, Gottlieb Wikler [ Harry A. Gottlieb of counsel], for the respondent.



Inasmuch as the insured's doctor advised him to submit to an operation for hernia, and testified that in his opinion a prudent man would have followed that advice, it cannot be held that the condition from which the insured was suffering constituted a total and permanent disability within the meaning of the policy. (See Palloni v. Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corp., 215 A.D. 634.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur; present, CALLAHAN, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 25, 1934
152 Misc. 439 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HYMAN FINKELSTEIN, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 25, 1934

Citations

152 Misc. 439 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 629

Citing Cases

Volunteer State Life Ins. Co. v. Weaver

Cody v. John Hancock, etc., Co., 111 W. Va. 518, 163 S.E. 4, 86 A.L.R. 354; Liberty L. A. Soc. v. Downs…

Seaman v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Where insured's physician advised him to submit to operation for hernia and, in physician's opinion, prudent…