Opinion
No. 5257/05.
November 28, 2007.
Witnesses — Subpoena — Motion to Quash. Witnesses — Privileged Communications — Attorney-Client Privilege.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Finkelman v. Klaus
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Nov 28, 2007
17 Misc. 3d 1138 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)
Summaries of
Finkelman v. Klaus
Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Nov 28, 2007
17 Misc. 3d 1138 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)
Case details for
Finkelman v. Klaus
Case Details
Full title:Finkelman v. Klaus
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Nassau County
Date published: Nov 28, 2007
Citations
17 Misc. 3d 1138 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 52331
Citing Cases
In re Estate of Tillimbo
Furthermore, ESI and the documents generated in that native language form may be discoverable even when a…
Mayer v. MarronNavistar contends that, it has always been a non-party and regardless of whether the court grants plaintiffs'…