From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkel v. Rico Elec., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 17, 2012
11 CV 4232 (SJ) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2012)

Opinion

11 CV 4232 (SJ) (CLP)

12-17-2012

DR. GERALD FINKEL, as Chairman of the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry, Plaintiff, v. Rico Electric, Inc., and Barry Hirsch, Defendants.

APPEARANCES COHEN, WEISS AND SIMON LLP By: David Ronald Hock Attorneys for Plaintiffs


ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

APPEARANCES
COHEN, WEISS AND SIMON LLP
By: David Ronald Hock
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JOHNSON, Senior District Judge:

Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("Report") prepared by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Judge Pollak issued the Report on October 1, 2012, and provided the parties with the requisite amount of time to file any objections. Neither party filed any objections to the Report. For the reasons stated herein, this Court affirms and adopts the Report in its entirety.

A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 10 days of service of the recommendation, any party may file written objections to the magistrate's report. See id. Upon de novo review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations. See id. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections may waive the right to appeal this Court's Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Small v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989).

In this case, objections to Magistrate Judge Pollak's recommendations were due on October 18, 2012. No objections to the Report were filed with this Court. Upon review of the recommendations, this Court adopts and affirms Magistrate Judge Pollak's Report in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2012

Brooklyn, NY

___________

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Finkel v. Rico Elec., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 17, 2012
11 CV 4232 (SJ) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Finkel v. Rico Elec., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DR. GERALD FINKEL, as Chairman of the Joint Industry Board of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 17, 2012

Citations

11 CV 4232 (SJ) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2012)

Citing Cases

Zuffa, LLC v. S. Beach Saloon, Inc.

Trustees of New York City Dist. Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund v. Best Made Floors, Inc., No. 16-CV-3429,…

Sands Harbor Marina Corp. v. Wells Fargo Ins. Servs. of Or., Inc.

"As to paralegals, courts in the Eastern District of New York have held that $90-$100 per hour is a…