From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkbeiner v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 17, 2015
CASE NO. 13-13906 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 17, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 13-13906

02-17-2015

KRIS R. FINKBEINER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REMANDING PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Plaintiff Kris Finkbeiner brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying the application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff filed the claim on October 26, 2009, alleging a disability onset date of December 30, 2008. In his Decision, dated March 30, 2012,, the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") concluded that Plaintiff was not disabled.

After the Appeals Council denied review, McEwen timely filed this action for judicial review of the Commissioner's decision. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated January 8, 2015, Magistrate Judge Binder recommended that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and that Plaintiff's motion be granted. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that the matter be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the R&R pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R needed to be filed "within fourteen (14) days of service" and that a party's failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No. 21 at 18). Neither party filed an objection. Moreover, this Court agrees with the analysis contained in the R&R.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDS this matter pursuant to Sentence Six for further proceedings and consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: February 17, 2015

s/Marianne O. Battani

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on February 17, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks

Case Manager


Summaries of

Finkbeiner v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 17, 2015
CASE NO. 13-13906 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Finkbeiner v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:KRIS R. FINKBEINER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 17, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 13-13906 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 17, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wobrock v. Berryhill

Notably, the regulation does not state that the ALJ must explain the weight given to non-medical sources who…

Weaver v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

20 C.F.R. § 404.1513(d)(4). It was entitled to consideration. See SSR 06-03p, 2006 WL 2329939, at * 1, 4; see…