From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fine v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 1997
238 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 22, 1997


Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J., and a jury), entered on or about December 4, 1995, dismissing the complaint in an action to recover for housing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The verdict was supported by evidence that demonstrated that the Board of Directors had valid reasons for not approving plaintiff's application, including his admittedly untruthful answers on his application form, his persistent tardiness in paying rent to his present landlord and his lack of any apparent assets, which were not shown by plaintiff to be a pretext for discrimination ( see, Hitter v. Rubin, 208 A.D.2d 480, 481). We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Fine v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 1997
238 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Fine v. Berman

Case Details

Full title:MARSHALL R. FINE, Appellant, v. KAREN A. BERMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 6

Citing Cases

Wiener v. 150 West End Owners Corp.

In opposition to the motion, the plaintiff failed to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient…

Sirianni v. Rafaloff

Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants.…