From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Findley v. State

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 25, 2010
Civil 10-186 ADM/FLN (D. Minn. Aug. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Civil 10-186 ADM/FLN.

August 25, 2010


ORDER


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated August 4, 2010, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1) Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [#1] is DENIED and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
2) Respondents' Motion to Dismiss [#7] is DENIED as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), a Certificate of Appealability will not be issued because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of any constitutional right.


Summaries of

Findley v. State

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 25, 2010
Civil 10-186 ADM/FLN (D. Minn. Aug. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Findley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Aaron Findley, Petitioner, v. State of Minnesota and Jessica Symmes…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 25, 2010

Citations

Civil 10-186 ADM/FLN (D. Minn. Aug. 25, 2010)