From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filiatrault v. United States

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
May 10, 2024
24-CV-396 (JMB/DLM) (D. Minn. May. 10, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-396 (JMB/DLM)

05-10-2024

Evan Gerald Filiatrault, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Jeffrey M. Bryan, Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated April 15, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.) The R&R recommends that this matter be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. (See Doc. No. 4.) Petitioner Evan Gerald Filiatrault did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the abovecaptioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED;

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Filiatrault v. United States

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
May 10, 2024
24-CV-396 (JMB/DLM) (D. Minn. May. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Filiatrault v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Evan Gerald Filiatrault, Petitioner, v. United States of America…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: May 10, 2024

Citations

24-CV-396 (JMB/DLM) (D. Minn. May. 10, 2024)