From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Figueroa v. Saul

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jun 9, 2021
Civ. 1:21-00094-KRS (D.N.M. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

Civ. 1:21-00094-KRS

06-09-2021

ONIBAG FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

M. THAYNE WARNER Special Assistant United States Attorney LAURA J. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff


M. THAYNE WARNER

Special Assistant United States Attorney

LAURA J. JOHNSON

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION

KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 12), it being stated that Plaintiff concurs in the granting of the motion, the Court having read the motion and being fully advised in the premises finds that there is good cause for granting the motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant is granted through August 9, 2021, to file his answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint.


Summaries of

Figueroa v. Saul

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jun 9, 2021
Civ. 1:21-00094-KRS (D.N.M. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Figueroa v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ONIBAG FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

Civ. 1:21-00094-KRS (D.N.M. Jun. 9, 2021)