To constitute a certificate of purchase, in the sense of section 1925 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is not necessary that it should contain the word "certify." The receiver's receipt in this case contains [24 P. 303] the whole substance of an official certificate of purchase; and that ejectment may be maintained on the title and right of possession evidenced by such certificate, there seems to be no doubt. (Toland v. Mandell , 38 Cal. 30; McDonald v. Edmonds , 44 Cal. 328; Laugenour v. Hennagin , 59 Cal. 625; Stanway v. Rubio , 51 Cal. 41; Conlan v. Quinby , 51 Cal. 413; Byers v. Neal , 43 Cal. 215; Figg v. Hensley , 52 Cal. 299.) The case of Lynch v. Brigham , 49 Cal. 137, cited by appellant, is not in conflict with any of the cases above cited.