From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 16, 2008
263 S.W.3d 780 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 90579.

September 16, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.

Irene C. Karns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Prior report: 194 S.W.3d 923.



ORDER


Orlando Fields ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that trial counsel Robert Steele provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to advise Movant that he could testify at the penalty phase of his trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Fields v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 16, 2008
263 S.W.3d 780 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Fields v. State

Case Details

Full title:Orlando FIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 16, 2008

Citations

263 S.W.3d 780 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)