From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 24, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-12658 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-12658

07-24-2012

EDMUND FIELDS, #487029, Petitioner, v. DAVID BERGH, Respondent.


HONORABLE DENISE PAGE HOOD


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

This is a habeas case brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner, a Michigan prisoner, is challenging the validity of his second-degree murder and felony firearm convictions. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel. Petitioner states that he cannot afford counsel, that he may need counsel if an evidentiary hearing is conducted, and that the issues in this case are complex. Petitioner has submitted his habeas petition and supporting documents, but Respondent has not yet filed an answer to the petition or the state court record.

Petitioner has no absolute right to be represented by counsel on federal habeas corpus review. See Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 65 F.3d 489, 492 (6th Cir. 1995); see also Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 293 (1992) (citing Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)). "'[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.'" Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting United States v. Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)). Petitioner has submitted his pleadings in support of his claims. Neither an evidentiary hearing nor discovery are necessary at this time, and the interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, Rules 6(a) and 8(c). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel. The Court will bear in mind Petitioner's request if, upon further review of the case, the Court determines that appointment of counsel is necessary. Petitioner need not file an additional motion concerning this issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

Denise Page Hood

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon Edmund Fields #487029, 3225 John Conley Drive, Lapeer, MI 48446 and counsel of record on July 24, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

LaShawn R. Saulsberry

Case Manager


Summaries of

Fields v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 24, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-12658 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Fields v. Bergh

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND FIELDS, #487029, Petitioner, v. DAVID BERGH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-12658 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 24, 2012)